The 12-Month Contract Is a Red Flag, Not a Commitment Device

David Selva · · 2 min read

Marketing Contracts, Vendor Management, Local Service Business

A marketing company that needs a year-long contract to keep you is telling you, upfront, that the work alone won't be enough to keep you.

A 12-month contract exists to solve one problem: keeping a client who would otherwise leave. That's worth sitting with before signing anything, because it means the company asking for that term already expects the results alone might not be enough to keep you around.

What the contract is actually protecting

Contracts protect revenue predictability for the seller — a full year of guaranteed billing regardless of what results show up in month four. That's a completely reasonable thing for a company to want. It is not the same thing as a commitment to you, and treating it like one is where owners get burned. Read the term as what it actually is: a hedge against you leaving, not a promise about what you'll get.

The cancellation fee tells the real story

Look past the length of the term and find the cancellation clause. I've seen early-termination fees that equal the entire remaining balance of the contract — meaning "cancel anytime" quietly becomes "pay for the whole year anyway, just faster." If leaving early costs almost the same as staying, the term length was never really the commitment. The fee was.

What month-to-month actually forces

A vendor with no lock-in has to earn the relationship every single billing cycle, which changes behavior in a way no contract clause can. Support response times, campaign attention, and how fast problems get addressed all tend to improve when the alternative is losing the account next month instead of eleven months from now.

Read the cancellation clause before the pricing page

Before you sign anything, find the exact word for how you exit — not how you enter. If leaving costs almost nothing, the length of the term barely matters. If it costs nearly what staying would, that's the number that should have been on the pricing page in the first place.

Back to Industry LoogoBlog